The init and analyze steps were pinned to 7999b86c, a commit no release tag
points at, with a "# v4" comment that names another commit (zizmor
ref-version-mismatch, two code-scanning alerts). Both steps now use
2892aa5e, the commit of v4.38.2, with that exact version as the comment.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

The language website ran a Spring Boot application on JVM 25 for two
endpoints, and it was the only JVM on the server: a quarter of a
gigabyte of resident memory for /api/v1/site and /health. The server
already runs ASP.NET Core 10 for Progmaweb.

The API is now Progmasoft.Tala.Website.Api, a minimal ASP.NET Core 10
application under the namespace Progmasoft.Tala.Website. It answers as
before: /api/v1/site returns the site's own state as the same JSON,
POST is not allowed there, /health answers with an empty 200, and every
other path is 404. It listens on 127.0.0.1, port 5086 unless PORT says
otherwise, as the Spring process did, so Nginx is unchanged.

- Progmasoft.Tala.Website.slnx, Directory.Build.props and global.json
  set up the solution with warnings as errors, documentation comments
  required and NuGet lock files.
- Progmasoft.Tala.Website.Api.Tests runs the endpoints in an in-memory
  host with xUnit v3 on Microsoft.Testing.Platform.
- ops/systemd/tala-site-api.service runs the published DLL on the shared
  runtime from /srv/xsharp/website/current/site-api, with the hardening
  of the unit it replaces.
- CI builds, tests, publishes and reports coverage with dotnet; CodeQL
  analyzes C# instead of Kotlin; Renovate watches NuGet instead of
  Gradle.

zizmor audits the workflows themselves for what makes a workflow
unsafe, and uploads what it finds to code scanning. Its first run here
found one thing, 4 times: a checkout that leaves the job's token in
the checked-out repository, where any later step can read it. No
workflow pushes or needs the token after the checkout, so every checkout
now sets persist-credentials to false, and zizmor reports nothing.

OpenSSF Scorecard grades how the repository is kept: branch protection,
pinned dependencies, token permissions and the like. It runs on the
default branch and weekly, publishes its score and uploads its findings to
code scanning.

Dependency Review fails a pull request that adds or changes a dependency
with a known vulnerability of high severity or worse. Dependabot watches
what is already there; this holds what comes in.

Every new action is pinned to a commit, each job names the permissions
it needs, and no new workflow has a default permission.