We still keep the error check in the function, but hide it in an
outlined function inside a .cpp file, to promote inlining of the
retrieval part.

In the future, we should explore two things

1) Skipping over the context retrieval here, allowing direct access.
   I currently do not see a way to do this while keeping the
   "greppability" of mutable vs immutable accesses that is there now,
   but it would help a lot when inlining is not enabled.
2) Removing the error check, to make the function trivially inlinable,
   and without branches.

**runtime difference**

| --------- | Debug | Release |
|:----------|------:|--------:|
| Slow path |  0.98 |    1.07 |
| Fast path |  1.04 |    1.08 |

We lost bit of performance on the assertion slow path in debug mode,
but together with the previous commit, it comes out at net zero.
For other combinations, we see 5-10% perf improvement across the
two commits.

Since the change to make the message macros thread-safe, and thus
thread-local, there is no need to handle messages through instance
of `RunContext`.

Together with the previous change, this means that `ScopedMessage`
only needs to keep around a single unsigned int.

This builds on the existing work to make assertion thread safe,
by adding an extra synchronization point in the holder of
`ReusableStringStream`'s stream instances, as those are used to
build the messages, and finishing the move of message scope holders
to be thread-local.

All the previous refactoring to make the assertion fast paths
smaller and faster also allows us to implement the fast paths
just with thread-local and atomic variables, without full mutexes.

However, the performance overhead of thread-safe assertions is
still significant for single threaded usage:

|  slowdown |  Debug  | Release |
|-----------|--------:|--------:|
| fast path |   1.04x |   1.43x |
| slow path |   1.16x |   1.22x |

Thus, we don't make the assertions thread-safe by default, and instead
provide a build-time configuration option that the users can set to get
thread-safe assertions.

This commit is functional, but it still needs some follow-up work:
 * We do not need full seq_cst increments for the atomic counters,
   and using weaker ones can be faster.
 * We brute-force updating the reporter-friendly totals from internal
   atomic counters by doing it everywhere. We should properly trace
   where this is needed instead.
 * Message macros (`INFO`, `UNSCOPED_INFO`, `CAPTURE`, etc) are not
   made thread safe in this commit, but they can be made thread safe
   in the future, by building on top of this work.
 * Add more tests, including with thread-sanitizer, and compiled
   examples to the repository. Right now, these changes have been
   compiled with tsan manually, but these tests are not added to CI.

Closes #2948

This improves the fast path performance for successful assertions
by about 7%, at the cost of potentially keeping around the message
allocation longer.

Instead of doing range-based removals, we only erase specific message,
because there can never be more than 1 message with the specific ID.

This means that:
1) Scoped messages are always removed at the end of their scope,
   even if the scope ended due to an exception.
2) Scoped messages outlive section end, if that section's scope is
   enclosed in their own.

Previously neither of these were true, which has led to a number
of surprising behaviour, where e.g. this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    try {
        INFO( "some info" );
        throw std::runtime_error( "ex" );
    } catch (std::exception const&) {}

    REQUIRE( false );
}
```
would print "some info" as the message for the assertion, while this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    INFO("Hello");
    SECTION("dummy") {}
    REQUIRE(false);
}
```
would not print out "Hello" as the message for the assertion.

This had an underlying reason, in that it was trying to helpfully
keep the messages around in case of unexpected exceptions, so that
code like this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    auto [input, expected] = GENERATE(...);
    CAPTURE(input);
    auto result = transform(input); // throws
    REQUIRE(result == expected);
}
```
would report the value of `input` when `transform` throws. However,
it was surprising in practice and was causing various issues around
handling of messages in other cases.

Closes #1759
Closes #2019
Closes #2959