The thread-safety changes in assertions & messages turned the message
stacks into thread-local state, instead of it being member of `RunContext`.
The relevant {push,pop}(Un)ScopedMessage functions were turned from member
functions into static functions, but this left `catch_message.hpp` with
dependency on `IResultCapture`'s definition for the functions, and thus
it still had to include `catch_interfaces_capture.hpp`.

With this change, `catch_message.hpp` no longer needs
`catch_interfaces_capture.hpp`.

Closes #2954
Closes #3010

Since the change to make the message macros thread-safe, and thus
thread-local, there is no need to handle messages through instance
of `RunContext`.

Together with the previous change, this means that `ScopedMessage`
only needs to keep around a single unsigned int.

This builds on the existing work to make assertion thread safe,
by adding an extra synchronization point in the holder of
`ReusableStringStream`'s stream instances, as those are used to
build the messages, and finishing the move of message scope holders
to be thread-local.

This means that:
1) Scoped messages are always removed at the end of their scope,
   even if the scope ended due to an exception.
2) Scoped messages outlive section end, if that section's scope is
   enclosed in their own.

Previously neither of these were true, which has led to a number
of surprising behaviour, where e.g. this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    try {
        INFO( "some info" );
        throw std::runtime_error( "ex" );
    } catch (std::exception const&) {}

    REQUIRE( false );
}
```
would print "some info" as the message for the assertion, while this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    INFO("Hello");
    SECTION("dummy") {}
    REQUIRE(false);
}
```
would not print out "Hello" as the message for the assertion.

This had an underlying reason, in that it was trying to helpfully
keep the messages around in case of unexpected exceptions, so that
code like this:
```cpp
TEST_CASE() {
    auto [input, expected] = GENERATE(...);
    CAPTURE(input);
    auto result = transform(input); // throws
    REQUIRE(result == expected);
}
```
would report the value of `input` when `transform` throws. However,
it was surprising in practice and was causing various issues around
handling of messages in other cases.

Closes #1759
Closes #2019
Closes #2959

Closes #2891

* bugprone-branch-clone
* bugprone-copy-constructor-init
* bugprone-empty-catch
* bugprone-sizeof-expression
* bugprone-switch-missing-default-case
* bugprone-unused-local-non-trivial-variable
* clang-analyzer-core.uninitialized.Assign
* clang-analyzer-cplusplus.Move
* clang-analyzer-optin.cplusplus.VirtualCall
* modernize-loop-convert
* modernize-raw-string-literal
* modernize-use-equals-default
* modernize-use-override
* modernize-use-using
* performance-avoid-endl
* performance-inefficient-string-concatenation
* performance-inefficient-vector-operation
* performance-noexcept-move-constructor
* performance-unnecessary-value-param (and improve generator example)
* readability-duplicate-include
* readability-inconsistent-declaration-parameter-name
* readability-non-const-parameter
* readability-redundant-casting
* readability-redundant-member-init
* readability-redundant-smartptr-get
* readability-static-accessed-through-instance
* unused variable in amalgamted tests